- Enterprise Architecture: The Struggle is Real
- Posts
- The One-Slide Solution Architect
The One-Slide Solution Architect
Why architects love their diagrams more than reality.
Greetings, architects of illusion! 🎨
This week, we journey into the land of immaculate slide decks — where arrows align perfectly, cloud icons sparkle, and the One-Slide Solution Architect reigns supreme.
The Main Story: The Slide That Saved the Program
Picture this:
A high-stakes steering committee meeting. The air is thick with uncertainty, and the project’s on fire. Then, from the back of the room, our hero steps forward — laptop glowing, voice steady.
“Don’t worry,” they whisper, “I have the slide.”
The lights dim.
A single PowerPoint slide appears — boxes, arrows, maybe a tasteful gradient.
The audience gasps. The CIO nods. Someone whispers, “It’s beautiful.”
For a fleeting moment, everyone believes that alignment, scalability, and ROI will flow directly from this pixel-perfect masterpiece.
Reality, of course, remains entirely unchanged.
TOGAF to the Rescue (As Usual)
TOGAF reminds us that a view is not the thing itself. A diagram is merely a representation — a guide to shared understanding, not a talisman of truth.
Architecture Views (per TOGAF) should communicate with stakeholders, not hypnotize them.
A Repository is where artifacts live — not where reality goes to die.
And yes, the Architecture Development Method (ADM) still expects us to validate that “slide” against actual requirements, not wishful thinking.
Educational Twist: From Slides to Substance
To escape the cult of the One-Slide Architect:
Validate your visuals with reality — map them to real systems, processes, and owners.
Separate communication from confirmation — a clean diagram doesn’t mean the solution works.
Use architecture views purposefully — not as performance art.
Humor in Diagrams

Ever built the perfect diagram — only to watch the implementation crumble?
Share your best “One-Slide” war stories below!
Next Week’s Tease
Episode 45: The Great Governance Goose Chase — when every decision needs a committee, and every committee needs another meeting.